Prop. 8 ruling ignores precedent, evidence and common sense
By refusing to acknowledge binding Supreme Court precedent, substantial evidence produced at trial that was contrary to the holding and plain common sense, the ruling exhibits none of the requirements of a traditional decision. This opinion is arbitrary and capricious, and its alarming legal methodology and overtly policy-driven tenor are too extreme to stand.
by Edwin Meese III at Washington Post
Help Make A Difference By Sharing These Articles On Facebook, Twitter And Elsewhere: